Development and validation of a prototype multimedia application to enhance health education on the pelvic floor muscles among pregnant and puerperal women in Brazil
Original Article

Development and validation of a prototype multimedia application to enhance health education on the pelvic floor muscles among pregnant and puerperal women in Brazil

Ana Jéssica dos Santos Sousa^, Jessica Gabriela de Godoi Fernandes, Carolina Angélico, Patricia Driusso^

Women’s Health Research Laboratory (LAMU), Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: All authors; (II) Administrative support: All authors; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: All authors; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: All authors; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: AJDS Sousa, P Driusso; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

^ORCID: Ana Jéssica dos Santos Sousa, 0000-0003-1714-8709; Patricia Driusso, 0000-0001-8067-9786.

Correspondence to: Patricia Driusso. Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, km 235, CEP: 13565-905, São Carlos, SP, Brazil. Email: pdriusso@ufscar.br.

Background: Women are interested in and need to receive more information about pelvic floor muscles (PFMs), its functions, and dysfunctions. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a multimedia application (app) aimed to enhance health education on PFM among pregnant and postpartum women in Brazil.

Methods: This is a descriptive, transversal study in the modality of technological production, consisting of three stages, namely, bibliographic review, development of the multimedia app prototype, and validation of the multimedia app by specialists in the fields of health and technology as well as pregnant and postpartum women. The validation specialists answered an instrument that evaluated several skills including functioning, content, language, illustrations, general aspects, innovation and design, and level of satisfaction. The data obtained were tabulated and analyzed using Microsoft Excel for Windows® 2010. Analysis of the validation of the app prototype and its content was performed using the Content Validity Index (CVI) and by calculating the percentage of absolute agreement.

Results: The app presented a CVI of 0.89 by experts and 0.93 by the participating pregnant and postpartum women, with a global CVI of 0.91. The level of agreement between professionals and the participating pregnant and postpartum women was 93.7% and 95.8%, respectively, resulting in an overall level of agreement of 94.8%.

Conclusions: The educational material in the app format was evaluated based on its functionality, content, language, illustrations, design, and innovation. Furthermore, the content has been validated for pregnant and postpartum women. Thus, this content will contribute to the promotion of health education and dissemination of information regarding PFM, its functions, and dysfunctions.

Keywords: Pregnant women; pelvic floor; health education


Received: 13 October 2022; Accepted: 17 March 2023; Published online: 10 April 2023.

doi: 10.21037/mhealth-22-40


Highlight box

Key finding

• The educational material in the application was validated based on its functionality, content, language, illustrations, design, and innovation.

What is known and what is new?

• Women are interested to receive more information about pelvic floor muscles, its functions, and dysfunctions.

• The application content will contribute to the promotion of health education and dissemination of information regarding pelvic floor muscle, its functions, and dysfunctions.

What is the implication, and what should change now?

• The health education for pregnant and postpartum women can promote autonomy in decision-making and improve their quality of life.


Introduction

Background

The pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) are responsible for supporting the pelvic organs, urinary and fecal continence, and sexual functions (1). Pregnancy and childbirth are major risk factors for PFM disorders such as urinary and fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and sexual dysfunction (2-4). Thus, a highly accessible health education is needed about PFM anatomy (5), function (1), and potential for dysfunction (6) within the perinatal year (2,3), as drawn from the scientific literature (4).

Rationale and knowledge gap

There are known limits to pregnant women’s education access about the pelvic floor and their functions via clinicians (7,8), hence direct to consumer health instruction has merit. A study indicate that women feel the need to receive more information about PFM and that acquiring knowledge in this regard can reduce anxiety related to the development of PFM dysfunctions (4). In addition, women who receive knowledge underlying the importance of PFM during pregnancy exhibit increased satisfaction with the childbirth experience (9).

Among the therapeutic treatments available to prevent PFM dysfunction, pelvic floor muscles training (PFMT) is a minimally invasive first-line treatment for PFM disorders that can be performed during pregnancy and after delivery (10). Evidence indicates that PFMT performed during pregnancy can reduce the risk of developing urinary incontinence (UI) pre- and postpartum by approximately 62% (11) and improve the quality of life of women with UI disorders (12).

Unfortunately, not all women have access to information on PFM, their functions and the benefits of PFMT (4). Therefore, there is a need to develop technological tools to expand women’s knowledge in this context (13).

Objective

Thus, the general objective of the present project was to develop and validate an accessible and free multimedia application (app) that provides health education on PFM, primarily focusing on pregnant women as the target audience. This manuscript is written following STROBE reporting checklist (available at https://mhealth.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/mhealth-22-40/rc) (14).


Methods

This research is descriptive and transversal, in the modality of technological production, developed in the Laboratory of Research in Women’s Health, Department of Physiotherapy. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Federal University of São Carlos (CAAE:40121820.30000.5504) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). All participants agreed to participate and provided their informed consent in electronic format.

The research was conducted from March 2021 to March 2022 across three stages, namely, bibliographic review and language adequacy; multimedia app prototype development methodology; and validation of the multimedia app by specialists in the fields of health and technology as well as by pregnant and postpartum women.

Bibliographic review and language adequacy

This first stage consists of conducting a theoretical-scientific survey that supports the selection of information contained in the app interface. To survey the relevance of health education promoted by the app, an electronic search strategy was performed using combinations of keywords with the Boolean operators AND, OR, and NOT. The search was performed in the PubMed database using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) tool, based on the following health descriptors: health education, pregnant women, pregnancy, pelvic floor, and pelvic floor disorders.

The inclusion criteria comprised content on anatomy, function, and dysfunction of the pelvic floor in pregnant and postpartum women; physical therapy assessment and intervention in PFM disorders in pregnant and postpartum women; PFM preparation strategies for childbirth; health education aimed at pregnant women; and the benefits and barriers associated with this practice. In addition, the language used in the survey was adapted to make it accessible to the target audience, making it possible for the population to understand the content.

Multimedia application prototype development methodology

During the prototype development stage, this study used the contextualized instructional design (CID), which consists of the intentional and systematic action of planning, developing, and applying specific didactic situations, incorporating mechanisms that favor contextualization and human learning (15). Thus, based on the CID model, the Multimedia app includes the following steps.

Analysis phase

The educational objectives, content, and technological infrastructure were defined in the creation of a diagram to guide the construction of the tool (Appendix 1).

Design phase

Definitions of pedagogical concepts that promote learning, planning, and production of didactic content; definition of topics and writing of screens; selection of media; and the design of the interface (layout) were established.

Development phase

The Android® operating system (Google, United States) was selected for the development of the mobile platform based on its popularity and use in different types of devices (smartphones, tablets, cell phones, etc.). The app was developed and hosted on a Wix platform (https://pt.wix.com).

Implementation phase

In this phase, the configuration of educational technology tools and resources was carried out. Furthermore, an environment for downloading the app was configured on the Internet and installed on a mobile device.

Validation of the multimedia App

The app validation was performed in two stages. First, experts in the area of health and technology were consulted. Second, pregnant and postpartum women validated the data. Specialists of the health and technology, pregnant and puerperal women aged 18 years or older were included in this study. Pregnant and puerperal women were invited to participate in the research through the dissemination of the project on social media (i.e., facebook, and instagram). Experts interested were communicated electronically via e-mail by the researchers. There was the attempt to recruit a diverse population in terms of age, level of schooling and country region. Were excluded participants who refused to sign the Free and Informed Consent Term (FICT), which outlined the objectives and purpose of the project. The FICT was provided on Google Forms, and all participants were able to download a copy.

After demonstrating interest in participating in the validation, the professionals received an e-mail with the procedures for the validation process of the educational material: the link to access the app content, hosted on the Wix platform, and the instrument validation questionnaire, which included some objectives and essay questions to enhance the contribution of suggestions for improvement. Furthermore, the changes proposed by the specialists were analyzed and implemented. Thereafter, the prototype was validated by pregnant and postpartum women, as well as by future users of the material.

For the proper evaluation of the application, a specific instrument was adapted and used to assess competencies and assess the importance of the content in this educational material (16,17). Particularly, the following criteria were evaluated: functionality, content, language, illustrations, design, innovation, and satisfaction with the application. The validation form was composed of questions related to educational aspects, didactic resources of the app, and the environment’s interface. The possible answers were based on the Likert (18) scale which includes: 1, strongly disapprove; 2, disapprove; 3, approve; 4, strongly approve (Table 1). Furthermore, additional comments and suggestions on each criterion to improve the educational material could be provided in a blank field at the end of each session.

Table 1

Application evaluation questionnaire

Item Strongly disapprove [1] Disapprove [2] Approve [3] Strongly approve [4]
Functionality
   1.1 Fast and simple app?
Content
   2.1 Do you think the information in the educational material is relevant for pregnant women and does it have the essential information needed to understand the pelvic floor musculature (its functions, dysfunctions, and training, among others)?
   2.2 Can the information in this educational material be used for prevention or search for treatment?
   2.3 Would you send this educational material to more people who might be interested in the topic?
   2.4 Does the content encourage pregnant women to continue to read, seek other information, and find professionals who help them and that can provide the services described in the application, among others?
Language
   3.1 Did you have any difficulty understanding the words used in the educational material?
Illustrations
   4.1 Are the app’s illustrations attractive and organized?
   4.2 Is the mount of images adequate?
   4.3 Are the images easy to understand?
General aspects
   5.1 Is the size of the educational material adequate?
   5.2 Is the presentation of the material adequate (i.e., colors, characters, and audio, among others)?
Design and innovation
   6.1 Is the application well-designed and innovative?
Satisfaction with the application
   7.1 I am well satisfied with the app.

app., application.

Statistical analysis

The data obtained were tabulated and analyzed using Microsoft Excel for Windows® 2010. For the distribution of sociodemographic and clinical data, descriptive analysis was performed using frequency (absolute and relative), measures of central tendency (mean), and dispersion (standard deviation).

The analysis of the app validation and its content was conducted using the Content Validity Index (CVI) (19), which allows verification of the usability/acceptability of a prototype app evaluated for both technical ease and appropriateness of content selection. According to the literature, a cutoff score exceeding 0.80 is ideal for validating educational materials (20). Furthermore, the percentage of absolute agreement was calculated, which consisted of the sum of positive responses from the evaluators divided by the total number of evaluations performed. The minimum level of consensus required in the literature was 75% (21).


Results

In the literature review, 1,141 studies were identified. Initially, duplicate studies were excluded. Then, the selection by titles was performed, followed by a selection of abstracts and, later, the full content of the articles. Nine articles were selected as a result of the literature review (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Flowchart of study selection.

Review papers from this study were used to support the content included in the educational material. Table 2 describes the selected articles.

Table 2

Descriptions of included studies

Author Methods Data
Miquelutti et al. [2013] Qualitative study Pregnant women with more information about PFM had greater control and self-confidence in labor and delivery
Miquelutti et al. [2013] Randomized controlled trial Women who underwent the systematic BPP had a lower occurrence of urinary incontinence. The BPP included PFMT and educational information about PFM
Miquelutti et al. [2015] Randomized controlled trial Details of the adopted conduct and the information were passed on to the women who participated in this research. Furthermore, it provides a basis for implementing birth preparation programs
Yikar et al. [2019] Quasi-experimental research with a control group Prenatal education reduces complaints during pregnancy and increases the quality of life of pregnant women
Daly et al. [2019] Cross-sectional study Many women do not receive any information about PFMT and its importance during prenatal care. This study presents statistical data on the lack of health education promotion, by healthcare providers, about PFM and PFMT
de Andrade et al. [2018] Randomized controlled trial A health education program on PFM improved women’s knowledge about the pelvic floor. However, it did not increase muscle and sexual function nor reduce the occurrence of urinary incontinence
Martínez-Galiano et al. [2014] Multicenter observational study Prenatal education did not influence the type of delivery, but it favored the woman’s active participation in childbirth and early skin-to-skin contact with the baby right after delivery. This study provides a basis for understanding the physiology of labor
Lawson et al. [2018] Literature review A theoretical foundation for PFM anatomy, functions, and dysfunctions. Furthermore, a framework for PFMT as a treatment and prevention option, among others
Castro-Pardiñas et al. [2017] Descriptive cross-sectional study Age and number of deliveries decrease PFM basal tone. Thus, healthy women had greater strength, endurance, and neuromuscular activity when compared to postpartum women and women with PFM dysfunctions

PFM, pelvic floor muscle; BPP, birth preparation program; PFMT, pelvic floor muscle training.

From the choice and organization of the content, it was necessary to analyze the best strategies to display this information. Particularly, this project aimed to enhance the understanding of the educational material among the target audience (i.e., pregnant and puerperal women). Consequently, simple expressions were used to avoid jargon from the health area, to maintain an informative, clear, and accessible language. Furthermore, the process was conducted using illustrations and videos. Moreover, images with subtitles were used, highlighting the basics required for understanding and avoiding excessive information that could discourage further reading and understanding of the material. The videos were created to synthesize content using animations that facilitated understanding.

Upon completing the content, evaluation strategies were created to include different perspectives of the subject. In this context, health and technology professionals (TP) and pregnant and postpartum women were invited.

The application validation content was initially conducted by 13 health professionals (HP) (81.3%) and three technology experts (18.7%). The socio-demographic data, including academic background and areas of operation, are described in Table 3.

Table 3

Description of sociodemographic data of health and TP

Variables N (%)
Sex
   Feminine 13 (81.3)
   Masculine 3 (18.7)
Age group (years)
   18–25 years 3 (18.7)
   26–30 years 4 (25.0)
   >30 years 9 (56.3)
Healthcare professionals’ data (N=13)
   Highest level of education completed
    University 1 (7.7)
    Postgraduate 12 (92.3)
   Current occupation
    Teaching practice 7 (53.8)
    Clinical practice 2 (15.4)
    Teaching and clinical practice 4 (30.8)
   Years of area expertise
    <5 years 3 (23.1)
    5–10 years 6 (46.1)
    >10 years 4 (30.8)
   Has experience with pregnant women
       Yes 12 (92.3)
       No 1 (7.7)
TP’ data (N=03)
   Highest level of education completed
    University 2 (66.7)
    Postgraduate 1 (33.3)
   Current occupation
    Teaching practice 0 (0.0)
    App Developer 3 (100.0)
   Years of area expertise
    ≤5 years 3 (100.0)
    >5 years 0 (0.0)
   Has experience with app development
    Yes 3 (100.0)
    No 0 (0.0)

TP, technology professionals; N, absolute sample frequency; %, sample frequency in percentage; app, application.

Table 4 presents the data underscoring the CVI for each item of the assessment instrument. The analysis was divided into HP and TP. In general, most of the evaluated criteria reached CVI values above the cutoff proposed by the literature of 0.80. Only Items 1.1 and 3.1, from the validation with TP, exhibited a lower CVI than expected. However, the average of the material was 0.89 among the experts, which was above the necessary cutoff.

Table 4

CVI of health and TP of each application evaluation item

Item Strongly disapprove, n (%) Disapprove, n (%) Approve, n (%) Strongly approve, n (%) CVI
HP TP HP TP HP TP HP TP HP TP
Functionality
   1.1 Fast and simple app? 0 0 0 2 (66.7) 4 (30.8) 0 9 (69.2) 1 (33.3) 0.92 0.5
Content
   2.1 Do you think the information in the educational material is relevant for pregnant women and does it have the essential information needed to understand the pelvic floor musculature (its functions, dysfunctions, and training, among others)? 0 0 0 0 2 (15.4) 0 11 (84.6) 3 (100.0) 0.96 1.0
   2.2 Can the information in this educational material be used for prevention or search for treatment? 0 0 0 0 2 (15.4) 0 11 (84.6) 3 (100.0) 0.96 1.0
   2.3 Would you send this educational material to more people who might be interested in the topic? 0 1 (33.3) 0 0 1 (7.7) 0 12 (92.3) 2 (66.7) 0.98 0.83
   2.4 Does the content encourage pregnant women to continue to read, seek other information, and find professionals who help them and that can provide the services described in the application, among others? 0 0 0 0 3 (23.1) 0 10 (76.9) 3 (100.0) 0.94 1.0
Language
   3.1 Did you have any difficulty understanding the words used in the educational material? 0 1 (33.3) 10 (76.9) 1 (33.3) 1 (7.7) 0 2 (15.4) 1 (33.3) 0.85 0.67
Illustrations
   4.1 Are the app’s illustrations attractive and organized? 1 (7.7) 0 0 0 3 (23.1) 1 (33.3) 9 (69.2) 2 (66.7) 0.90 0.92
   4.2 Is the mount of images adequate? 0 0 0 0 4 (30.8) 1 (33.3) 9 (69.2) 2 (66.7) 0.92 0.92
   4.3 Are the images easy to understand? 0 0 0 0 2 (15.4) 0 11 (84.6) 3 (100.0) 0.96 1.0
General aspects
   5.1 Is the size of the educational material adequate? 0 0 0 0 4 (30.8) 0 9 (69.2) 3 (100.0) 0.92 1.0
   5.2 Is the presentation of the material adequate (i.e., colors, characters, and audio, among others)? 1 (7.7) 0 0 0 2 (15.4) 0 10 (76.9) 3 (100.0) 0.92 1.0
Design and innovation
   6.1 Is the application well-designed and innovative? 0 0 0 0 3 (23.1) 0 10 (76.9) 3 (100.0) 0.94 1.0
Satisfaction with the application
   7.1 I am well satisfied with the app. 0 0 0 0 4 (30.8) 1 (33.3) 9 (69.2) 2 (66.7) 0.92 0.92

N, absolute sample frequency; %, sample frequency in percentage; HP, healthcare professionals; TP, technology professionals; CVI, Content Validity Index; app., application.

The professionals who participated in the validation suggested several improvements such as adding a video that could explain navigation across the app. They also suggested using more didactic language in the illustrations.

All evaluations were considered and analyzed, resulting in new modifications to the material for validation with the target audience. Table 5 presents the participants’ suggestions.

Table 5

Suggestions made by specialist professionals during the validation process

Sections Suggestions
Application function • Put a brief orientation about how to navigate through the material on the first page
• Decrease menu options to make it more straightforward and objective
• Make the app run faster by turning it into a more compact material
Content • Include a video that counts each set and repetition of the PFMT for the user to follow
• Add a page with the references used in the preparation of the material
• Point out that the pregnant woman can change her initial posture at the intervals of the exercises if she feels any discomfort
• Change the description of bladder placement to “is positioned in front of and below the uterus”
• Add that the perineal massage must be taught first by the physical therapist before the pregnant woman performs it alone or with the help of a partner
• Emphasize the need for rest time between contractions and sets
Language • Change the definition of episiotomy
• Correct spelling mistake in one of the sentences
• Change “there is” to “occurs” in “it is the channel where there is penetration during sexual intercourse...”
Illustrations • Highlight subtitles so that they can be more evident
• Add animation with pelvic organ prolapse
• Increase the size of the arrows of the perineal massage animation
• Emphasize the anteroposterior and elevation movement of the perineum in the animation of the PFM contraction
General aspects • Complete material, but a little extensive. It would be interesting to try to reduce some of the content
• Put colors with more contrast
Design and innovation • Enhance the organization of the pages in the menu
Satisfaction with the application • Add more illustrations
• Emphasize that women can continue PFMT after the delivery

PFMT, pelvic floor muscle training; PFM, pelvic floor muscle.

In the content validation stage with the target audience, 13 pregnant women (86.7%) and 2 postpartum women (13.3%) were recruited, with a mean age of 31.4±6.23 years. The outstanding sociodemographic data are presented in Table 6.

Table 6

Description of sociodemographic and clinical data of pregnant and postpartum women

Variables N (%)
Age group (years)
   18–25 3 (20.0)
   26–30 3 (20.0)
   >30 9 (60.0)
Level of schooling
   Elementary school 2 (13.3)
   High school 4 (26.7)
   University 4 (26.7)
   Postgraduate 5 (33.3)
Marital status
   Married 11 (73.3)
   Single 4 (26.7)
Country region
   Northeast 3 (20.0)
   Southeast 9 (60.0)
   South 3 (20.0)

N, absolute sample frequency; %, sample frequency in percentage.

Table 7 presents the CVI obtained from the app validation for pregnant and postpartum women. All evaluated criteria reached values above the 0.80 cutoffs. The average material was 0.93 among the target audience, indicating a high agreement.

Table 7

CVI of women of each application evaluation item

Item Strongly disapprove, n (%) Disapprove, n (%) Approve, n (%) Strongly approve, n (%) CVI
Functionality
   1.1 Fast and simple app? 0 0 4 (26.7) 11 (73.3) 0.93
Content
   2.1 Do you think the information in the educational material is relevant for pregnant women and does it have the essential information needed to understand the pelvic floor musculature (its functions, dysfunctions, and training, among others)? 0 0 2 (13.3) 13 (86.7) 0.97
   2.2 Can the information in this educational material be used for prevention or search for treatment? 0 0 1 (6.7) 14 (93.3) 0.98
   2.3 Would you send this educational material to more people who might be interested in the topic? 0 0 1 (6.7) 14 (93.3) 0.98
   2.4 Does the content encourage pregnant women to continue to read, seek other information, and find professionals who help them and that can provide the services described in the application, among others? 0 0 2 (13.3) 13 (86.7) 0.97
Language
   3.1 Did you have any difficulty understanding the words used in the educational material? 2 (13.3) 11 (73.3) 1 (6.7) 1 (6.7) 0.88
Illustrations
   4.1 Are the app’s illustrations attractive and organized? 2 (13.3) 0 1 (6.7) 12 (80.0) 0.92
   4.2 Is the mount of images adequate? 1 (6.7) 0 3 (20.0) 11 (73.3) 0.92
   4.3 Are the images easy to understand? 0 1 (6.7) 3 (20.0) 11 (73.3) 0.90
General aspects
   5.1 Is the size of the educational material adequate? 1 (6.7) 0 3 (20.0) 11 (73.3) 0.92
   5.2 Is the presentation of the material adequate (i.e., colors, characters, and audio, among others)? 0 1 (6.7) 3 (20.0) 11 (73.3) 0.90
Design and innovation
   6.1 Is the application well-designed and innovative? 0 0 4 (26.7) 11 (73.3) 0.93
Satisfaction with the application
   7.1 I am well satisfied with the app. 0 0 2 (13.3) 13 (86.7) 0.97

N, absolute sample frequency; %, sample frequency in percentage; CVI, Content Validity Index; app., application.

After this validation process by specialist professionals and target audience, the app prototype was finalized for the health education of pregnant and postpartum women on PFM. The images of the application pages are illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2 The layout of the developed multimedia app prototype.

Discussion

Pregnant women have a limited understanding of the functions and dysfunctions of the PFM (7), despite its extreme importance. In addition, practices such as intense medicalization, disrespect for the autonomy of the pregnant woman, and unnecessary interventions (i.e. episiotomy and instrumental birth), among others, contribute to increased risks for motherhood, childbirth, and puerperium (22).

Expanded access to this content will promote enhanced autonomy for pregnant women by ensuring that they have the necessary information to make important decisions about prenatal care and childbirth interventions that may impact PFM function. Gaining such knowledge increases the likelihood that these women will feel safe and satisfied with their choices. According to the guidelines established by the National Policy for Integral Attention to Women’s Health, improving the women’s quality of life through health promotion, aiming at integrated healthcare, is necessary during this period of pregnancy and puerperium (22).

App creation is based on the growing use of technologies by the population (23) and seeks to build tools that act as facilitators in accessing new knowledge. Asklund et al. [2017] (24) created a mobile app for stress UI treatment in women and found a decrease in symptoms and an increase in quality of life. In addition, previously proposed educational materials were analyzed to have a basis on which contents should be addressed and an understanding of how to apply them and their possible results (25,26). In agreement with previous studies, our study showed a high level of agreement between experts and the target audience. Thus, the app may be an effective tool for education de mulheres with health issue similar.

The item “functionality” presented CVI among TP below the literature cutoff. This can be explained by the experience of higher-performance tools hosted in app stores. However, it is essential to note that other users of this material had a good experience. Furthermore, the “language” criterion was evaluated by TP below the cutoff. Therefore, the content was reviewed before being sent to pregnant women.

As the global average of educational materials reached a CVI value higher than that proposed in the literature, the content can be considered validated. Except for the two items already mentioned, the evaluations of professionals and the target audience showed a high level of agreement, demonstrating the effectiveness of the tool for pregnant and postpartum women. Therefore, the material will contribute to disseminating information about PFM and PFMT during pregnancy, providing a knowledge base for users who will benefit and make choices informed by scientific evidence.

This study had limitations concerning the sample size and diversity of pregnant and postpartum women. In addition, most participants exhibited a high level of education, which may have facilitated their understanding of the material. Evaluation by an ampler and a more diverse group of women could have contributed to different suggestions, resulting in further improvement. Moreover, the use of the app requires access to the Internet and mobile tools. However, many pregnant individuals do not have unlimited access to these technologies (27).


Conclusions

The application presented a CVI of 0.91, an agreement level between professionals of 93.7%, and between pregnant and postpartum women of 95.8%. The overall agreement was 94.8%, which was considered validated. Thus, the educational material on this app is expected to contribute to the dissemination of information on PFM and its importance, functions, and dysfunctions. Making this knowledge widely accessible can promote health education for pregnant and postpartum women, enhance their autonomy to make decisions with a scientific basis underscoring prenatal care and childbirth, and improve their quality of life. This application was developed and validated with the intention that pregnant and puerperal women have direct access to this information, however, we believe that this educational resource can also be used by HP.

In the future, we intend to insert the application in operating system stores and carry out new tests to identify performance, compatibility, and errors related to the operating system. In addition, we also intend to analyze the adherence and self-efficacy of using this application in pregnant and puerperal women.


Acknowledgments

Funding: This study was financed in part by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-(CAPES)-Finance Code 001 and São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) (Project No. 2018/26718-9).


Footnote

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the STROBE reporting checklist. Available at https://mhealth.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/mhealth-22-40/rc

Data Sharing Statement: Available at https://mhealth.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/mhealth-22-40/dss

Peer Review File: Available at https://mhealth.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/mhealth-22-40/prf

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://mhealth.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/mhealth-22-40/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Federal University of São Carlos (CAAE:40121820.30000.5504) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). All participants agreed to participate and provided their informed consent in electronic format.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Eickmeyer SM. Anatomy and Physiology of the Pelvic Floor. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2017;28:455-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Mørkved S, Bø K. Effect of pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy and after childbirth on prevention and treatment of urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2014;48:299-310. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Bø K, Hilde G, Tennfjord MK, et al. Pelvic floor muscle function, pelvic floor dysfunction and diastasis recti abdominis: Prospective cohort study. Neurourol Urodyn 2017;36:716-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Neels H, Tjalma WA, Wyndaele JJ, et al. Knowledge of the pelvic floor in menopausal women and in peripartum women. J Phys Ther Sci 2016;28:3020-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Peschers U, DeLancey J. Anatomy. In: Therapeutic Management of Incontinence and Pelvic Pain [Internet]. London: Springer, 2019:9-20. Available online: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-84628-756-5_2
  6. D'Ancona C, Haylen B, Oelke M, et al. The International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 2019;38:433-77. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Hill AM, McPhail SM, Wilson JM, et al. Pregnant women's awareness, knowledge and beliefs about pelvic floor muscles: a cross-sectional survey. Int Urogynecol J 2017;28:1557-65. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. O'Neill AT, Hockey J, O'Brien P, et al. Knowledge of pelvic floor problems: a study of third trimester, primiparous women. Int Urogynecol J 2017;28:125-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Miquelutti MA, Cecatti JG, Makuch MY. Antenatal education and the birthing experience of Brazilian women: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:171. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Lawson S, Sacks A. Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy and Women's Health Promotion. J Midwifery Womens Health 2018;63:410-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Woodley SJ, Boyle R, Cody JD, et al. Pelvic floor muscle training for prevention and treatment of urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;12:CD007471. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Rogers RG, Ninivaggio C, Gallagher K, et al. Pelvic floor symptoms and quality of life changes during first pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. Int Urogynecol J 2017;28:1701-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Dumoulin C, Hay-Smith J, Frawley H, et al. 2014 consensus statement on improving pelvic floor muscle training adherence: International Continence Society 2011 State-of-the-Science Seminar. Neurourol Urodyn 2015;34:600-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 2014;12:1495-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Filatro AC. Learning design como fundamentação teórico-prática para o design instrucional contextualizado. [São Paulo]: Universidade de São Paulo, 2008;35-369. Available online: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/48/48134/tde-12062008-142556/en.php
  16. Duarte P, Canelas R, Soares R, et al. Avaliação para a aprendizagem em educação a distância: uma revisão integrativa de estudos sobre a utilização de e-rubricas. II Congresso Intencional TIC e Educação Em Direção à Educação 2012;2:3127-43. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rui-Soares-12/publication/256090419_II_Congresso_Internacional_TIC_e_Educacao_3127_AVALIACAO_PARA_A_APRENDIZAGEM_EM_EDUCACAO_A_DISTANCIA_UMA_REVISAO_INTEGRATIVA_DE_ESTUDOS_SOBRE_A_UTILIZACAO_DE_E-_RUBRICAS/links/00b7d521a2c17bc31e000000/II-Congresso-Internacional-TIC-e-Educacao-3127-AVALIACAO-PARA-A-APRENDIZAGEM-EM-EDUCACAO-A-DISTANCIA-UMA-REVISAO-INTEGRATIVA-DE-ESTUDOS-SOBRE-A-UTILIZACAO-DE-E-RUBRICAS.pdf
  17. Hernández Martín A, Casillas Martín S, Mena Marcos JJ. Elaboración de una rúbrica para la evaluación de la asignatura" Las TIC como instrumentos de innovación educativa" perteneciente al Máster: las TIC en educación. Análisis y diseño de procesos, recursos y prácticas formativas. Universidad Salamanca. 2016:1-30. Available online: https://gredos.usal.es/bitstream/handle/10366/130653/MID_15_72.pdf?sequence=1
  18. Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology 1932;55:22-140.
  19. Polit DF, Beck CT. The Content Validity Index: Are You Sure You Know What’s Being Reported? Critique and Recommendations. Researchin Nursing & Health 2006:489-97.
  20. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research 1986;35:382-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Lima AC, Bezerra KC, Sousa DM, et al. Development and validation of a booklet for prevention of vertical HIV transmission. Acta Paul Enferm ;201730:181-9.
  22. Brasil. Política nacional de atenção integral à saúde da mulher: princípios e diretrizes. Brasília Ministério da Saúde, 2004:1-82.
  23. UNESCO B. O Futuro da aprendizagem móvel: implicações para planejadores e gestores de políticas. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000228074, consultado a. 2014;10.
  24. Asklund I, Nyström E, Sjöström M, et al. Mobile app for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn 2017;36:1369-76. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  25. Hyakutake MT, Han V, Cundiff GW, et al. Pelvic Floor Health Education: Can a Workshop Enhance Patient Counseling During Pregnancy? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2016;22:336-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  26. Hyakutake MT, Han V, Baerg L, et al. Pregnancy-Associated Pelvic Floor Health Knowledge and Reduction of Symptoms: The PREPARED Randomized Controlled Trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2018;40:418-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  27. FÓRUM DE REFLEXÃO UNIVERSITÁRIA – UNICAMP. Desafios da pesquisa no Brasil: uma contribuição ao debate. São Paulo em Perspectiva 2002;16:15-23. [Crossref]
doi: 10.21037/mhealth-22-40
Cite this article as: Sousa AJDS, Fernandes JGG, Angélico C, Driusso P. Development and validation of a prototype multimedia application to enhance health education on the pelvic floor muscles among pregnant and puerperal women in Brazil. mHealth 2023;9:14.

Download Citation